Thereโs an obvious reason adults read coming-of-age novels: They remind us of what it was like to change from child to adult. More than that, they evoke โrealโ memories. They probably donโt refer directly to us, but they certainly refer to people we knewโor thought we knew. As I read Reno author Ben Rogersโ novel, The Flamer, I was frequently transported back to the days Phil Burling and I tore up my home town in Nebraska. The hero of The Flamer, a middle-into-highschooler, Oby Brooks, is interested in making explosions, rapid oxidation, chemistry. I remembered the many fires Phil and I sparked up, only a few of which caused substantial property damage.
The author of the book is plainly interested in these things as well, but heโs also interested in the human chemistries of hormones, relationships and emotionsโcomplex reactions among family members, friends, age groups and genders.
I donโt want to waste words with a long synopsis of this novel. Itโs about a boy whoโs confused about what kind of an adult heโs going to be. Heโs smart, which never made anything easier for any kid. He meets an archetypal โmanโ who teaches him some neat stuff and whoโs oh-so-much cooler than his mundane dad. He starts a series of events that burn down a big portion of his house. Heโs got an adventurous-to-gay friend (who loves Vienna sausages). He gets his first job in an adult world, where he meets a woman who captures his fancy. He puts her on a right path then leaves without saying goodbye, growing from a maladroit but likeable kid into a maladroit but likeable adult and a master blaster.
I was prepared not to like the book. The word games irritated me from the cover on. I guess theyโre over-broad for my taste. The Flamer? OK, I get there was a passive homosexual experience, and I get that the kid was interested in fire. (Although, to be fair, I remember being about this age when some older kid asked me if I was gay before it was a common euphemism. You can guess what I said.) Please donโt spell โaxโ as โaxeโ in the first paragraph of the first chapter unless you want me to spend the rest of the book wondering if thereโs a joke I didnโt get. The first word of the second paragraph was โOby,โ which I saw as a misspelled โBoy,โ and then spent the rest of the novel annoyed by the obviousness of the anagram and hoping Rogers at least would not feel the need to explain it. While he got many nicknames in the book to illustrate his development, at least Oby wasnโt Aman in the end. But again, Iโm fully cognizant that kids this age like this kind of word play, and when I was 14 or so, I used to love these connections I could make into the writerโs mind.
But I liked many more things about this novel than I disliked. I liked the foundation metaphor of explosive chemical reactions representing sexual maturity. Who didnโt feel like they were playing with fire at that age? Rogers does some provocative stuff with punctuationโomitting quotation marks, for example. His idiosyncratic punctuation is sort of a meta-symbol for whatโs going on with Oby, experimental from a scientific method, which would make this a coming-of-age autobiography. I liked how Rogers used Renoโs streets, the hills west of town, the geography of this place as a character in the novel. Moving from home to school to trailer to quarry advanced the action from an uncertain security to a certain insecurity, the necessary journey in a coming-of-age novel. When Rogers wants to be subtle, he can.
But most of all, I liked the kid. As I said, I knew him.
