Not that thereโs any suspense. Sometimes you have to sit through a whole more than three-hour production of Selling Bonds to Finance the Trench just, well, because. You already know the ending. The vote will be 4 to 3. The pro-trench crowdโMayor Griffin, Councilfolk Dave Aiazzi, Pierre Hascheff and Sherrie Doyleโwill win. You even rightly predict that the penultimate moment will include an impassioned speech by Councilwoman Jessica Sferrazza-Hogan on the importance of letting the people vote.
The only thing you were really wondering is what song, exactly, would guitar-playing citizen activist Sam Dehne rip off during public comment.
The discussion got off to a late start. Doyle was missing. Delayed.
โCan you believe theyโre going to hold this up for their fourth vote?โ former councilwoman/mayoral candidate Candice Pearce complained. The room was jammed with construction workers, suits and trench critics sans petitions.
(Fun side note: Downtown resident Janet Clark manned a trench vote petition booth at the Home & Garden Show over the weekend. The mayor and his wife came to visit the booth next door, a low-flow toilet display. โHis face was beet red,โ Clark told me. โBut he ignored us.”)
Doyle finally appeared. The 90-minute public comment circus began. Dave Howard of the Reno-Sparks Chamber of Commerce said he was โfrankly tired.โ Dehne worked the crowd for two minutes and 45 seconds of his public comment time. Then he sang a few bars of โTheyโve been working with the railroad all the live long day,โ turned and pointed to the council: โAnd whereโd all the money go? Theyโve got it!โ Then โdingโ rang the three-minute timer. Perfect. What an act.
Then came the gritty discussion on the sale of $115 milllion in bonds (and a $50 million loan from the feds) to finance the depressed railway. Yes, the bond insurer reneged on an earlier agreement, so the bonds arenโt technically insured yet. But an agreement with another insurer (at $4 million, no longer $2 million) is almost a done deal. And yes, weโre selling bonds before July, when the bids from four construction firms come in, but we have to take advantage of those famed low interest rates. (With every quarter-percent interest hike, the city can plan on spending another $4 to $5 million.) Sure, the bond is now $15 million more than it was two years ago, and the debt will need servicing for 40 years instead of 30 years. It could end up costing an extra $88 million in interest (unless itโs possible to pay down the principle early).
And yes, folks have been circulating a petition to put the whole issue to a public vote, but really.
Take a deep breath.
The good news with the ReTRAC bond biz is that the city isnโt putting any of its general fund on the line to back the bonds (as it is with the downtown events center bonds). And even if revenues donโt come in to make the payments, no oneโs going to go raising taxes in Reno to pay for the trench. And in the best-case scenario, the whole 40-year bond can be paid off 18 years earlyโin 2024.
And we have Hascheffโs word that, when the bids are read in July, if the city canโt afford to move ahead, itโs over.
“Thereโll be no need for a public vote.”
