Not that thereโ€™s any suspense. Sometimes you have to sit through a whole more than three-hour production of Selling Bonds to Finance the Trench just, well, because. You already know the ending. The vote will be 4 to 3. The pro-trench crowdโ€”Mayor Griffin, Councilfolk Dave Aiazzi, Pierre Hascheff and Sherrie Doyleโ€”will win. You even rightly predict that the penultimate moment will include an impassioned speech by Councilwoman Jessica Sferrazza-Hogan on the importance of letting the people vote.

The only thing you were really wondering is what song, exactly, would guitar-playing citizen activist Sam Dehne rip off during public comment.

The discussion got off to a late start. Doyle was missing. Delayed.

โ€œCan you believe theyโ€™re going to hold this up for their fourth vote?โ€ former councilwoman/mayoral candidate Candice Pearce complained. The room was jammed with construction workers, suits and trench critics sans petitions.

(Fun side note: Downtown resident Janet Clark manned a trench vote petition booth at the Home & Garden Show over the weekend. The mayor and his wife came to visit the booth next door, a low-flow toilet display. โ€œHis face was beet red,โ€ Clark told me. โ€œBut he ignored us.”)

Doyle finally appeared. The 90-minute public comment circus began. Dave Howard of the Reno-Sparks Chamber of Commerce said he was โ€œfrankly tired.โ€ Dehne worked the crowd for two minutes and 45 seconds of his public comment time. Then he sang a few bars of โ€œTheyโ€™ve been working with the railroad all the live long day,โ€ turned and pointed to the council: โ€œAnd whereโ€™d all the money go? Theyโ€™ve got it!โ€ Then โ€œdingโ€ rang the three-minute timer. Perfect. What an act.

Then came the gritty discussion on the sale of $115 milllion in bonds (and a $50 million loan from the feds) to finance the depressed railway. Yes, the bond insurer reneged on an earlier agreement, so the bonds arenโ€™t technically insured yet. But an agreement with another insurer (at $4 million, no longer $2 million) is almost a done deal. And yes, weโ€™re selling bonds before July, when the bids from four construction firms come in, but we have to take advantage of those famed low interest rates. (With every quarter-percent interest hike, the city can plan on spending another $4 to $5 million.) Sure, the bond is now $15 million more than it was two years ago, and the debt will need servicing for 40 years instead of 30 years. It could end up costing an extra $88 million in interest (unless itโ€™s possible to pay down the principle early).

And yes, folks have been circulating a petition to put the whole issue to a public vote, but really.

Take a deep breath.

The good news with the ReTRAC bond biz is that the city isnโ€™t putting any of its general fund on the line to back the bonds (as it is with the downtown events center bonds). And even if revenues donโ€™t come in to make the payments, no oneโ€™s going to go raising taxes in Reno to pay for the trench. And in the best-case scenario, the whole 40-year bond can be paid off 18 years earlyโ€”in 2024.

And we have Hascheffโ€™s word that, when the bids are read in July, if the city canโ€™t afford to move ahead, itโ€™s over.

“Thereโ€™ll be no need for a public vote.”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *