Posted inNews


If citizens want to give their two cents’ worth to City Hall, can they use equipment paid for by tax dollars?

Discussion of this issue was sedate during the Reno City Council’s Mar. 19 special session, at least compared to the previous meeting, when the city attorney, councilmembers and citizens squabbled over the use of audio-visual equipment during presentations to the council. Peace activists filed a lawsuit claiming unfair treatment during the Mar. 12 public-comment period.

This week, the council sought to clarify its earlier policy that a citizen could use the microphone but not a projector that displays materials on overhead screens. Inconsistent enforcement of the policy led to the showdown between City Attorney Patricia Lynch and anti-war activist Patricia Axelrod at the Mar. 12 meeting.

Two councilmembers defended a citizen’s right to display photos and other printed material.

“I don’t think it’s a good policy,” said Councilwoman Jessica Sferrazza. She said the policy has been selectively enforced. “Any member of the public should be able to use the equipment. People should be able to address us freely and openly.”

Councilman Pierre Hascheff agreed.

The two had been silent when Axelrod was shut down after displaying a photo of a charred corpse. Hascheff defended his silence, saying that since the item hadn’t been on the agenda, he couldn’t speak to the issue.

Mayor Robert Cashell introduced a new concern: that the SNCAT viewing public not be subjected to visual aids during the public-comment period. SNCAT is a cable channel that broadcasts the public meetings of several government agencies. If inappropriate material were broadcast, the council might be held liable. Sferrazza was not alone in her dismissal of this notion.

First Amendment expert Allen Lichtenstein said that liability concerns are “nonsense.”

“What the fear is really about,” said the ACLU spokesman, “is offending people, [but] we’re better off when full disclosure and openness trump individual sensibilities.”

Councilman Dwight Dortsch favored pulling the plug entirely. “There’s no need for audio-visual equipment,” he said.

Sferrazza’s motion that everyone be allowed to use the equipment failed, garnering only Hascheff’s support. Instead, the council passed a motion that citizens can use the equipment during public comment but that SNCAT can’t broadcast material projected within the chamber. Only Sferrazza voted against the new policy. In minutes, City Hall’s Sharon Spangler was on the phone to Don Alexander, production director at SNCAT.

“Generally we leave the camera locked down on the person anyway,” he said after hearing the new directive. His job wouldn’t be affected by the 45-minute debate. “It’s not changing our operation to any real extent.”

The “content-neutral” public-access channel shows a loose upper body shot when someone speaks during public comment. It’s unusual, he said, for people to use the A/V equipment.

If a person were to hold up a picture at chest level, what would he do? He wasn’t sure, since City Hall hadn’t given any direction on that eventuality.

Lichtenstein said the new policy is legal but “appears not to be a particularly well-thought-out policy.”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Posted inDennis Myers Memorial


Private thoughts
Speaking of Harry Reid, the senator received an honorary degree and gave the commencement address over the weekend at his law school alma mater, George Washington University. Some of the speech dealt with the judicial filibuster problem, which had not yet been settled, and that section of the address was widely reported across the nation. But another part of the speech—an apology—went unreported:

“I last set foot on George Washington’s campus in January of 1964. That is the time I graduated from law school. In the 40 years since, I haven’t been back to campus or returned a letter. I’ve been holding a grudge.

“Law school was hard for me—I worked six full days a week as a policeman at the U.S. Capitol, and I was a full-time law student. At the time, my wife and I were very young and didn’t have a lot of money. We had a young daughter and, as I said, I was working full time and going to school full time. My wife was pregnant and wasn’t able to work.

“With my job at the Capitol, we managed to get by, but just barely. Then one fateful day, my Buick Roadmaster’s transmission collapsed. So here we were—no car, no way to get to work, too many bills, and now a car needing its own help.

“Seeking assistance and counsel, I sought one of the law school deans. After I explained my situation, he looked me in the eye and gave me this advice: ‘Why don’t you just quit law school?’

“I don’t remember exactly what I thought he would say, but that was not it. I thought perhaps he would offer some words of encouragement, or maybe even some assistance—but I never imagined he would tell me just to quit. Since that day, I’ve harbored ill-will towards this school. He was only one man, but his words stung, and they stuck with me for years.

“In retrospect, I should have gotten over it sooner. I’m sorry I didn’t. So I apologize to the entire faculty, administration and all of the law students for my pettiness. It’s not how I’ve tried to live my life.”

Reid said the filibuster battle and debate over the nomination of judges had “caused me to be conscious of advice and forgiveness.”

Dennis Myers was the news editor of the Reno News & Review. He was a journalist for more than four decades. In 1987-88 he was chief deputy secretary of state of Nevada. He was coauthor of Uniquely...

Sign In

We've recently sent you an authentication link. Please, check your inbox!

Sign in with a password below, or sign in using your email.

Get a code sent to your email to sign in, or sign in using a password.

Enter the code you received via email to sign in, or sign in using a password.


By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions.