Posted inNews


New voting machines are another reason the general election will be even more closely watched than elections past.
New voting machines are another reason the general election will be even more closely watched than elections past.

Hardball politics
In Nevada in late August, Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, met with the registrars from the Reno and Las Vegas areas. Peck says Washoe County registrar Daniel Burk “noted that he had received calls” from people identifying themselves as members of the Republican Party. These Republicans, Peck stated, said “they intended to be out at polling places to challenge voters.”

Many members of the media are looking at the dangers voting machines may pose to the integrity of the national election. Others are wondering whether voters may be disenfranchised by the use of faulty felon lists, as happened in Florida in 2000. Indications of efforts to depress turnout in Democratic precincts have appeared in numerous states, including Nevada, most of them swing states.

In Florida, disenfranchised felon purge lists were issued that contained 2,100 names of voters who are actually fully eligible to vote. In Michigan and Missouri, there are techniques being used for suppressing the vote in minority precincts, such as heavier use of poll watchers to challenge voters in cities such as Detroit than in other areas. In New Mexico, the state GOP sued to stop first-time voter registrations through progressive groups that are not accompanied by identification cards.

In Nevada, the techniques seem just as aggressive. “An official of the Republican Party” came to Burk’s office one day with a small group, he says. The official asked how to launch a “full-scale program for challenging voters who come to the polls.” Burk says he informed the Republicans that vote challenges should be used narrowly, when one voter with personal knowledge of another calls attention to a problem.

“One [person] said, ‘Well, we were thinking of a wider-scale use of it. We were thinking of challenging lots of voters,’ “ says Burk. It was the way they looked at each other, he says. “I began to wonder, ‘What are they up to?’ I just told them I wouldn’t tolerate it. The process isn’t designed for one party challenging another.”

Burk worked as a registrar in Oregon for 18 years before he came to his position in Nevada seven years ago. “I have never in all those 25 years had a person challenge another person,” he says.

The revelations, says Peck, are “consistent with reports people are getting all around the country. Republicans have a national strategy of going out and challenging voters” come Nov. 2.

“Our concerns are utterly nonpartisan,” says Peck. “It’s the integrity and fairness of the election.” Although Nevada law does allow for voter challenges when a challenger has personal information about a voter’s citizenship or place of residence, “it becomes problematic when people are using this strategically, in a partisan way.” For instance, he says, “it would certainly be improper if they picked out the names of Latinos.”

Juventino Camarena, a field representative for the Painters Union, is registering voters and keeping an eye out on voter protection issues as part of the My Vote–My Right campaign of the AFL-CIO. He is worried.

“The people have been thinking what happened in Florida couldn’t happen in Nevada,” Camarena says. “Now, we’re seeing little tactics here and little tactics there. There are all kinds of ways to confuse a person so bad that he takes it to his heart that it’s so difficult, and I’m doing it for what? I’ve seen it in Mexico since I was a little kid. That’s why I took it to heart to stop it. They’re suppressing the right of the voter.”

This story is an edited excerpt from a longer piece that ran in the October 2004 issue of The Progressive magazine. The entire story can be found at

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Posted inDennis Myers Memorial


Guinn goes national
Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn has become a bit of an issue in the Virginia governor’s race.

Guinn chairs the Republican Governors Association (RGA), which decided in April to endorse former Virginia Attorney General Jerry Kilgore in that state’s campaign for governor. Unlike most states, Virginia holds its governorship elections in odd-numbered years, and as a result those campaigns get attention out of proportion to what they would otherwise receive.

On April 26, Guinn and RGA Vice Chairman Mitt Romney of Massachusetts announced the endorsement, with Guinn saying, “Endorsing Jerry is something that we have discussed at length with our fellow Republican governors, and there was a clear consensus that Jerry Kilgore is the candidate that will provide the leadership that Virginia deserves. … We are going to spend whatever is necessary to win Virginia. We want to make sure that the commonwealth has the best possible leadership—and that is Jerry Kilgore.”

Endorsement brought with it substantial dollars, including a $282,000 media buy on Kilgore’s behalf by the RGA. That triggered an angry blast from Virginia Lt. Gov. Tim Kaine, who is also running for governor. (Kaine is a Democrat but seems to be trying to get through the campaign without ever admitting it. His campaign graphics don’t mention his affiliation, nor does his Web page.)

Kaine issued a statement that the NGA was “airing the first negative television ad of the 2005 Virginia Gubernatorial campaign, attacking Tim Kaine on the issue of homeowner taxes.”

He then fired at Govs. Guinn and Romney: “According to the Washington Post, Guinn pushed through the biggest increase in Nevada history. He defended himself by saying: ‘Some people say that makes me a bad Republican,’ said the former banker and corporate executive. ‘Well, I would be a worse Republican, and a worse grandfather, and a worse citizen, if I didn’t find enough money to educate our children and fund our Medicaid program and provide decent prenatal care.’ ”

There was also a Kaine attack on a “2-cent-a-gallon backdoor gas tax increase in Massachusetts” under Romney.

Attacks on Guinn and Romney then proliferated across the Internet, and variants—most of them using the Washington Post quote—now appear on a couple of dozen Web pages.

Dennis Myers was the news editor of the Reno News & Review. He was a journalist for more than four decades. In 1987-88 he was chief deputy secretary of state of Nevada. He was coauthor of Uniquely...

Sign In

We've recently sent you an authentication link. Please, check your inbox!

Sign in with a password below, or sign in using your email.

Get a code sent to your email to sign in, or sign in using a password.

Enter the code you received via email to sign in, or sign in using a password.


By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions.